Translation

Key Words


Ribosome: the machine that synthesizes protein by translating the code of the mRNA (with the aid of tRNA). It has a small and large subunit and is made mainly of RNA.
  1. tRNA: Transfer RNA is the adaptor molecule that ferries the amino acid to the ribosome. It has an anticodon; a three-base sequence that reads the codon.
  2. Codon: three-base sequence on the mRNA that encodes an amino acid
  3. Anticodon: three-base sequence on the tRNA that reads the codon. It is complimentary to it.
  4. “A-site”: Anterior (or "Amino-acyl) site on the ribosome. This is the site where the tRNA enters with the amino acid linked to it's 3' CCA sequence.
  5. “P-site”: Posterior site (or "peptidyl" site). This is the site in the ribosome where the tRNA with the growing protein chain is attached.
  6. “E-site”: exit site on the ribosome.
  7. Start Codon: the initiator tRNA, which holds the first amino acid reads the codon AUG and carries the amino acid Methionine (Met, or “M”). The anticodon for the start codon is 5'CAU (think about).
  8. Stop Codon: there are three codons that tell the ribosome to stop translation (UAG; UAA, UGA).
  9. Reading Frame: Since the code is read in groups of three, non-overlapping bases, Any stretch of mRNA has three possible reading frames. Only one reading frame at a time is used.
  10. ORF, or Open Reading Frame: A stretch of codons that starts with an AUG and ends with a stop codon and therefore can encode a protein. While I usually only write out a few, a typical ORF would encode hundreds of amino acids. Collagen, for example, is a large protein and is 1400 amino acids or so long.

Overview


I’m going to draw a bit on wikipedia for this. Here is a figure from them:

Translation Overview
And here is a link to the video from HHMI. Translation in eukaryotes proceeds at about two amino acids per second. Bacteria is closer to 20 AA/second.

Regulatory sequences


Recall that there is a 5' untranslated sequence on the mRNA. There you will find sequences that direct the ribosome to the start of the protein-coding sequence. In bacteria, that sequence is more important and well characterized. In Eukaryotes, the regulation of where to start is less well understood…but we are learning.
This sets the reading frame:
Consider the sequence of letters BATHECATWASBADTHEDAYSHEBITTHEDOGOT, you can find the meaning only by starting at the correct letter (In this case, the third letter: THE CAT WAS BAD THE DAY SHE BIT THE DOG). If you start with BAT…that works…but the rest is not meaningful: HEC ATW ASB ADO).
The AUG tells the ribosome: put a Methionine here and keep reading in this frame. After some long series of amino acids, the Ribosome will encounter a stop codon, and release the mRNA (which does require a protein "released factor") and the newly made protein. Multiple ribosomes can be reading a single mRNA at one time, lined up one after the other.
The Code:
You need a triplet codon because you need three nucleotides to get enough possible combinations to encode all 20 Amino acids (there are 64 possible combinations, three of them are stop codons). The rest of the code is given below. Note that most amino acids have more than one codon. We say the code is “degenerate,” for this reason.
Here is the general code. Note that not every organism uses exactly this code. In a couple of organisms, UGA is read as a tryptophan codon, for example. How would this happen? Take a look at the where Tryptophan is in the codon table and predict what could change to lead to UGA becoming a stop codon.

Code

More detail on the mechanism:


Of course, there is more…much more. Here is a really cool video (with an interesting sound track) from a lab that works on one of my favorite proteins: EF-Tu (elongation factor Tu is the name for the protein in bacteria. But, the function exists in eukaryotic systems also).
EF-Tu is arguably the original G-protein (certainly the first one we figured out). It sets the minimum time a tRNA must stay in the ribosome before the peptide bond is formed. In this way, accuracy is greatly improved.
Also, while there is some argument on the details, the GTP hydrolysis is thought to be part of what drives the assembly to "ratchet" to the next site.


The next video up should be this one:

it's good too.

Telomeres and Telomerase

Telomeres and Telomerase:


After reading this, please read this short news piece from the journal "Nature."
http://www.nature.com/news/2010/101128/full/news.2010.635.html
Two problems:
  1. As we have discussed, the chemistry of replication leaves the lagging strand not fully replicated. There is a 3' extension of what had been the template. This would lead to shortening of the chromosome with each round of replication.
  2. We have not previously discussed this, but the ends of broken chromosomes, or just free ends of linear DNA, lead to recombination or “splicing” together of these fragments. Also, free ends of DNA tend to be degraded by enzymes quickly. So, what is special about the ends of our chromosomes that keeps this from happening?
Telomeres can be described as the specialized ends of chromosomes that protect the rest of chromosome and keep it stable.

Cancer and the Hayflick Limit


Our cells seem to go through a fixed number of divisions before they no longer can keep going. This is called the “Hayflick Limit” after the person who noticed it.
However, cancer cells are immortal…they overcome this limit. Also, there must be a way for cells to fix the problem so that we can “reset” the Hayflick limit when a new embryo is formed. One more thing: one-celled organisms don’t have a Hayflick limit. They can grow indefinitely. All of this pointed to some enzyme activity needed to maintain the ends.

The Sequence:


Well, since we are talking about DNA, it seems likely that there is some specific sequence that corresponds to the Telomere. There is. In humans and other vertebrates, the sequence is the short repeat 5'(TTAGGG)n, where “n” is an integer between 300 and 8000. So, that can be 50,000 bases.
  • How does it get there?
  • How does it achieve the goals above?

Telomerase:


The enzyme Telomerase is a little unusual. It has a DNA polymerase activity and needs a 3' end to which it adds. But, it carries a short RNA that acts as its template. So, it finds the free 3' end, which is already longer than the newly replicated strand (due to the lagging-strand problem), uses the internal template to extend the repeated sequence over and over again. Because it uses RNA as a template, but polymerizes DNA, it is known as an RNA-dependent DNA polymerase, also known as “reverse transcriptase,” since it is the opposite of transcription. The image is stolen from Wikipedia and shows the repeating sequence
Telomerase1
That’s how it gets there.
It fixes the shortening problem by just adding the sequence. This can then serve as a template for more lagging-strand synthesis. That will still leave a short 3' extension, but will re-lengthen the telomere.
It’s an interesting enzyme.I’ve found many other images with great detail on it, but decided to steal this one:
TelomereII

It shows that there is a long complex RNA that interacts with several proteins (Dyskerin, TERT and some smaller ones). The RNA is much more than the template. It folds into a complex structure that fits into the proteins. The reason I included this one because it makes reference to a couple of forms of a genetic disease known as “Dyskeratosis.” This is a version of premature aging where the effects are seen as premature organ failure, rather than an old-looking outward appearance. Does it make sense that mutations to genes in the telomerase complex would lead to that?

As for how it solves problem number two, the extended 3’ end will fold back around and, along with some accessory proteins, will form a complex, stable structure shown below in cartoon form:

Telomere1
This cartoon is from from:
http://www.bioscience.org/2008/v13/af/2825/fulltext.asp?bframe=figures.htm&doi=yes):

A more realistic view of the DNA in it’s four-strand form is below: (Image from Wikipedia):

TelomereQuad

The green dot is a monvalent cation.
This depicts how the structure forms. Note that the strands are
Parallel, not antiparallel.
(image from this website:
http://proj1.sinica.edu.tw/~tigpcbmb/course%20material/cb9903/cb9903.htm)


DNA Replication

DNA Replication


Let me lay out the basics:
Since DNA is two complimentary strands, each strand contains the information to specify the other. Thus, it seemed logical from the first time the structure was determined that the two strands would separate and new subunits (deoxyribonucleotides) would be added to make each new strand, using the other old strand as a template. Each new double helix would therefore really be one old strand and one new one.
Here is the basic idea in video. Like most of the videos I will link, these come from the Howard Hughes Medical Institutes (HHMI). Note that this video shows the new strands being made the same for both templates. As we know (and the video alludes), this cannot happen.

The first problem:


So, one strand is the template for the other. New bases are added one at a time via a simple chemical reaction we have talked about, mediated by a complicated enzyme machine (comprising many different proteins).
The problem is that the chemistry requires that a new subunit can only be added to the 3’ end. So, if you are moving along a replication fork, one strand cannot be replicated easily…the fork is moving the wrong way and it has to be replicated “backward.”
Here’s a more basic video that shows you how an Origin of replication might work and some detail, but in a much simpler form.
Here are two other videos
here and here that have merit, though all of them, including the cool one below, have errors in them.

Notice that there is a second problem.
As the video says, you need a short RNA primer to begin each section when synthesizing the lagging strand. This is put down by an enzyme called “primase.” The leading strand needed an RNA primer to get started too. But, since it is replicated continuously, it only needs one primer, way back at the start of replication.
Here is a link to the really cool video. I think you should look at it again, now that you have seen the simple one. We have to name all the enzymes and talk more about details tomorrow.

Here are the details of the problem


The unit of DNA polymerization (Synthesis) is a deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate. In the image, the “Base” would be either A, T, C or G, depending on what was on the template strand. Just like ATP, these molecules have high-energy (unstable, that is) bonds joining the phosphates. This can therefore be used in transfer reactions, just like enzymes transfer phosphates from ATP in reactions we have studied. There is a seemingly subtle change: instead of the third (
𝛄 or “gamma”) phosphate on the end being attacked by the OH on the 3' carbon, the first one is (called “α”). This change has a big impact, though. It links the 3' carbon of the existing DNA to the 5' carbon of the incoming base via a phosphate.
This is called a “phosphodiester.”

dNTP
Here is a specific example, deoxyATP
dATP
The next base that comes in will use the high-energy triphosphate it carries to attack the 3' OH.
TransferReaction
And forms this:
Dinucleotide

Thus, as we said, we must add DNA to the growing 3' end. From a chemical standpoint, there isn’t any reason why you cannot add an incoming base to the 5' end, provided that end has a 5' triphosphate. That triphosphate would be unstable, however. Should it hydrolyze, the new DNA wouldn’t be made until another enzyme came in and “recharged it” with new phosphates.

RNA Splicing

RNA Splicing part 1


Here is the link to that same
video which is presented by Cold Spring Harbor Lab, where I used to work years ago and where some of the work I discussed today was done.

Two benefits of splicing


While no one believes that RNA splicing evolved
because of these benefits, these are real benefits organisms now enjoy because of it.
  1. Alternative splicing: Not all the exons are included when splicing of specific mRNAs takes place. Different versions of the mRNA may be formed. In the example I gave earlier, exons 1, 3, and 4 could all be joined up in sequence, or, all 4 could be linked. This results in different versions of the protein, with different functions. The domain structure of proteins makes this possible. NOTE: you do not alter the order of the exons when this is done
  2. Exon shuffling: Also because of the domain structure of proteins, it is possible to add exons to genes via recombination and create different versions of the protein. Any chunk of DNA that has portions of introns on its ends that then is recombined (at the DNA level) into another intron will do no damage to an existing gene (It can be spliced out at the mRNA level). But, it also provides the possibility, through alternative splicing, to evolve proteins with new functions.
Key words:
Spliceosome: (there’s a good descriptive name) It’s the assembly of proteins and RNA that carry out splicing.
snRNPs (pronounced “snurps”). These are “small nuclear ribonuclear proteins.” They are the components of the spliceosome.
snRNAs: small nuclear RNAs are the main catalytic components. It is the RNA that carries out the reaction. They have names like “U1,” and “U2.” etc.


Self Splicing:
The story about how RNAs got spliced became more obvious when self-splicing RNAs were found. I mentioned these today.
The general reaction looks like this:
Splicing
There are two, successive trans esterification reactions that occur in a concerted way and use energy from an additional GTP that is brought in by the complex. The first takes a branch point sequence near the 3' end of the intron. The 2' OH of that branch point attacks the 5' exon/intron boundary. This splices the intron into a lariat and frees the 3' end of the exon, which then attack the 5' end of the next exon, resulting in the spliced exons and a lariat structure of the intron.
In the self-splicing form, “internal guide sequences” form base-paired structures that hold the players together and facilitate the attacks (which usually involve that 2' OH in an intermediate).
You can see below how the stem-loop structures formed using base pairs, then can fold into three-dimensional structures, facilitating catalysis. Yes, I know, it should have been obvious.

Self3

You can see how the base pairing can be used to bring the active sites together in more detail here. By the way, these last two images are used without permission. The one below is from the Molecule of the Month blog/discussion and the one above is from Trends in Ecology and Evolution.
Closeup

Normal mRNA splicing (non self-splicing)


The story is not all that different in the splicing of mRNA. There are guide sequences and a branch-point lariat. The chemistry varies a little as to who attacks whom when and where. But, the main difference is that the sequence of the intron is not that important for the structure to work. Instead of the intron folding into a complex structure, the separate RNAs in the snRNPs form those structures and then bind the specific sequences in the intron and at the intron-exon borders.




The Lac Operon

Operon:


After reading my blog, go to
this site and do the activity including the self test.
Also, this is an interactive demo that is moderately useful. You have to put all the elements in place on the "DNA" to see it operating. It works if you have JAVA running on your computer. If you have it blocked, it will download and you can tell your computer to run it. It is up to you. You don't have to do this one.

An operon is a system that exists in bacteria, but not in eukaryotes, for regulating several genes together. Suppose, for example, you are a bacteria that sometimes encounters the sugar lactose. It would be good to have the genes for proteins to process that. You’d need a transport protein to get the lactose into the cell efficiently, and an enzyme to break the lactose into its components, Glucose (you know how that can be used) and Galactose (which you can also convert to glucose).
But, you wouldn’t want to be making these proteins all the time. It would be a waste of energy. Ideally, you would have a system that kept the genes for these proteins “Off,” but then be able to sense the presence of lactose and turn the genes “On.”
That is the
lac operon. And it serves as an example.

What an operon needs


  1. A stretch of DNA that encodes several proteins on ONE mRNA. The ribosome will make all of them reading the same message. This does not happen in Eukaryotes.
  2. Promoter: a site on the DNA recognized by RNA polymerase (which carries it’s own transcription factor to bind the promoter sequence, in E. coli).
  3. Operator: A sequence in the DNA that binds another protein, called Repressor. When repressor is bound, the polymerase cannot get access to the promoter.
  4. A Repressor: The protein that binds the Operator and prevents transcription. It is usually encoded nearby, transcribed from another promoter. Importantly, the repressor has to exist in two states: One that binds the operator and prevents transcription of the genes and one that does not.
  5. Effector molecule: molecule, such as lactose in the example of the lac operon, that binds to repressor and switches it between the two states.

Below is a general picture taken from Wikipedia.
The players are numbered below as:
  1. RNA Polymerase
  2. Repressor
  3. Promoter
  4. Operator
  5. Inducer (such as Lactose)
  6. 6, 7 and 8: the coding sequences for several proteins.
In the first panel, the repressor is bound because the inducer is absent. RNA polymerase cannot gain access to the gene.
In the second panel, the inducer changes the shape of the repressor, which causes it to release from the operator. Transcription can then occur.
Note, that there are also cases where the repressor binds only in the presence of the effector molecule. So, you can turn off an operon when the effector is present. This is great for feedback inhibition. The Trp operon is an example of this and is described in the book.
Operon